Midlife Women Must Lead the Fight for Lifelong Healthcare Access
Continuity of women’s health care across our entire lifespan is a fundamental human right. However, women in the United States currently experience fragmentation, politicization, and denial of that continuity at critical moments.
Women’s Health is Continuous
We are also living in a time of alarming contradiction.
Healthcare for women is not meant to begin at puberty and quietly fade into neglect after the so-called “reproductive years.” Because “reproductive age” is often defined as ending in midlife, reproductive rights and midlife health are typically treated as separate conversations. In reality, they are deeply interconnected.
Women do not experience their bodies in isolated phases; our healthcare system should recognize this. From puberty to fertility to perimenopause to menopause and beyond, women deserve autonomy, access, knowledgeable providers, and compassionate, evidence-based care. These are not luxuries. They are necessities.
Awareness is Rising – Access is Not
On one hand, there is a growing cultural conversation about women’s midlife health. Menopause, once whispered about or ignored entirely, is finally entering the mainstream. Women are demanding better care, more research, and workplace policies that acknowledge the physiological realities and transitions of midlife.
There is momentum—long overdue—in recognizing that symptoms like brain fog, sleep disruption, mood changes, and metabolic shifts are not simply things to “push through” but legitimate health concerns worthy of attention, treatment, and support.
On the other hand, we are witnessing a tightening of reproductive healthcare access for younger women. In many parts of the country, autonomy over one’s own body is being restricted through legislation and institutional policies that limit access to abortion.
This can easily extend into limiting standard gynecologic care.
The result is a troubling paradox: women’s health is becoming more visible, yet in critical ways, less autonomous.
When Policy Interferes with Care
As a physician who has spent decades caring for women across all stages of life, I have seen firsthand what happens when policy interferes with care.
I remember caring for a woman who was miscarrying at four months. She was in a hospital setting, surrounded by professionals who understood exactly what her body was going through and what compassionate care would look like. Under different circumstances, we would have been able to help her complete the miscarriage in a way that minimized both her physical suffering and emotional trauma.
Instead, we were forced to wait.
We had to wait until her body went into labor on its own—or until she showed signs of infection. Only then could we intervene.
The helplessness we felt was terrible. This was not a question of medical uncertainty. It was a question of restriction. A system that prevented us from acting in the best interest of our patient forced her to endure unnecessary pain and risk.
In another case, I cared for a woman with an infected fallopian tube—a condition that can become life-threatening if not treated promptly. The standard of care in this situation is surgical removal of the infected tissue.
However, because the procedure was technically similar to a form of sterilization, it was not permitted under the hospital’s policies.
We could not operate.
The irony was devastating. By withholding timely care, we increased her risk of further pelvic infection—damage that could ultimately damage her future fertility, the very thing the policy was supposedly designed to protect.
These are not abstract policy debates.
These are real women, real bodies, and real consequences.
The Ripple Effect Across a Lifetime
When we separate reproductive health from the broader continuum of women’s health, we fail to see the full picture. Restrictions imposed in one phase of life ripple outward, shaping trust, access, and outcomes for decades.
A young woman who experiences limited autonomy in her reproductive years does not suddenly enter midlife with full confidence in the healthcare system.
She carries with her the imprint of those experiences.
The Power of Midlife Women
Fortunately, women in midlife hold a uniquely powerful position in this conversation.
We have lived through life phases in the healthcare system. Many have navigated contraception, pregnancy, miscarriage, and the onset of menopause. We understand the gaps, the feeling of being dismissed, the moments of excellent care, and the moments of the system failing us profoundly.
Our perspective is not theoretical; it is embodied.
Midlife women are also often the connective tissue of families and communities. In the United States, women make eighty percent of healthcare decisions. We are often caring for aging parents while supporting children or younger women in our lives.
We are making healthcare decisions not only for ourselves but also influencing those around us. We are leaders in workplaces, shaping policies that can either support or ignore women’s health needs. We are voters, advocates, and cultural influencers.
And yet, our voices are often underrepresented in the broader conversation about reproductive health policy.
This is a missed opportunity.
Bridging the Divide
Midlife women have the insight and authority to bridge the artificial divide between reproductive rights and menopause care. We understand, perhaps better than anyone, that women’s health is not a series of disconnected events but a continuous journey requiring consistent respect, autonomy, and access.
It is time to center that perspective.
A Call for Lifelong Care
We must move beyond fragmented thinking and toward a model of care—and policy—that honors the full lifespan of women’s health. This means protecting access to reproductive care, including abortion, as an essential component of healthcare. It means continuing to expand awareness, education, and treatment options for menopause.
And it means recognizing that both are part of the same fundamental principle: women deserve agency over their bodies at every stage of life.
Continuity of care is not just a medical ideal.
It is a moral one.
When we consistently support women—when we trust them, listen to them, and provide the care they need without unnecessary barriers—we create a healthier society for everyone.
The question is not whether we can afford to provide this level of care.
The question is whether we can afford the consequences of failing to recognize that continuity of women’s health care across our entire lifespan is a fundamental human right.
“Midlife change is often judged as chaos. I’ve come to see it as an invitation to trade ridicule for reverence. Beneath the so-called ‘midlife crisis’ isn’t recklessness—it’s the courage to feel what was once off-limits.”
– Dr. Liz Lyster
- Connect with Dr. Liz Lyster
- More articles from our Executive Contributor, Dr. Liz Lyster